Skip to main content
I

Approaches to Learning

The Core Beliefs of the New York State CBK, which also serve as the guiding principles of this document, state that:

  • Children construct their own knowledge based on their curiosity and driven by their interests. This active construction is facilitated by interaction with adults and other children.
  • Children’s learning is active and follows a recurring path: awareness, exploration, inquiry, and application.

The “Approaches to Learning” section of the Early Learning Guidelines describes what active learning looks like in early childhood. In this section, you can see how children construct their own knowledge through exploration and inquiry at each age. This domain provides guidance for how to support children in developing the characteristics of an active learner: curiosity, creativity, initiative, and persistence.

Fostering these approaches to learning in early childhood prepares children to become independent learners who are able to engage in complex thinking and analytical reasoning. When educators create learning environments and engage in interactions that build these approaches to learning, children develop the cognitive processes they will need to be successful in most schools. These cognitive processes include the ability to set their own goals, focus on a task, look at it from multiple perspectives, describe their thinking, and persevere.

In using the “What the Educator Might Observe” sections of this domain, be sure to account for the individual and cultural variations of the learner. For example, curiosity looks very different in different people. For one child, curiosity might look like telling the educator that they need a screwdriver to take apart an old radio and then energetically pulling it to pieces. For another child, it might look like reading a book about radios. And, for still another child, it might look like quietly observing an adult taking apart a radio. It is important that educators reflect on their own preferences, assumptions, and cultural expectations before deciding how to extend children’s approaches to learning.

The “Ways the Educator Might Support the Child’s Learning” sections include ideas that may be a cultural mismatch for some educators and families. For example, it suggests that in order to develop a child’s ability to take initiative, the educator should follow the child’s lead, notice what they are interested in, and then join their interests. Educators who were brought up to demonstrate ultimate respect to their elders may not feel that following a young child’s lead or giving them choices is valuable. Educators are encouraged to reflect with colleagues and families about the approaches to learning that prepare children to be successful in their cultures. What would these be called? What might educators observe at each age to see that the child was developing these approaches to learning?

View this domain by age Infants Toddlers Preschool Early elementary

Areas in this domain

References (12)

  1. California Department of Education. (2008). California preschool learning foundations. Sacramento, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/documents/preschoollf.pdf (opens in a new tab).
  2. California Department of Education. (2009). California infant/toddler learning & development foundations. Sacramento, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/re/documents/itfoundations2009.pdf (opens in a new tab).
  3. Colorado early learning and development guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://earlylearningco.org/pdf/ELDG_Guidelines_English.pdf (opens in a new tab).
  4. Dombro, A. L., Jewkes, A.M., Marsden, D.B., Meisels, S.J., & Weston, D.B., (2003). The ounce scale: standards for the developmental profiles (birth–42 months). New York, NY: Pearson Early Learning.
  5. Dichtelmiller, M.L. (2013). The work sampling system omnibus guidelines (preschool through third grade). New York, NY: Pearson.
  6. Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching & the brain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  7. High Scope Educational Research Foundation. (n.d.). Preschool child observation record. Ypsilanti, MI: Author.
  8. Irving Harris Foundation Professional Development Network. (2012, updated 2018). Diversity-informed tenets for work with infants, children, and families. Chicago, IL: Irving Harris Foundation. Retrieved from https://imhdivtenets.org/tenets/ (opens in a new tab).
  9. Office of Head Start. (2015). Head Start early learning outcome framework. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  10. Office of Head Start. (2018). Revisiting and updating the multicultural principles for Head Start programs serving children ages birth to five. Retrieved from https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs/gov/culture-language/article/mulituculral-principles-early-childhood-leaders (opens in a new tab).
  11. Washington State Department of Early Learning. (2012). Washington State early learning and development guidelines: Birth through 3rd grade. Olympia, WA: Author. Retrieved from www.del.wa.gov/development/benchmarks/Default.aspx (opens in a new tab).
  12. Wood, C. (2018). Yardsticks: Child and adolescent development 4–14. (4th Ed.). Turners Falls, MA: Center

Search

Find pages, resources, and information across our site.

Recent searches

Found for ""

No results found

Try different keywords or check spelling.

↑↓ Nav Enter Go Esc Exit